＊ペンシルバニアの最新の判事の判断は、37ページの意見付きで、その意見というのが
激しくトランプ陣営のやっていることに批判的なので話題になっている

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/after-horror-show-hearing-judge-throws-out-giuliani-and-trumps-bid-to-disenfranchise-almost-seven-million-pa-voters/
After Horror Show Hearing, Judge Throws Out Giuliani and Trump’s Bid to
‘Disenfranchise Almost Seven Million’ Pa. Voters
ADAM KLASFELDNov 21st, 2020, 6:50 pm 190

“In other words, Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven
million voters,” U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann wrote in a 37-page opinion.
“This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought
such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer
volume of votes asked to be invalidated. One might expect that when seeking
such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with
compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that
this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed
injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of
citizens.”

“That has not happened,” Brann emphasized. “Instead, this Court has been
presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative
accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence.
In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement
of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state.
Our people, laws, and institutions demand more.”