8 Experimental results Figure 8 shows the plot of the thermal power measured using the standard DGT protocol in the verification test conducted by DE using Ar in place of H2 and using the procedure that induces the pressure variations due to water boiling, as described in Parargph 7. It is clearly noted that, while using Ar (considered by DGT an inert element for prompting the reaction and used as a reference gas to show that the reaction does not occur using Ar) in place of H2 and without making use of the high voltage excitation circuit, we get a significant increase in the measured thermal power up to about 17 kW, well above that of the electrical power input of about 2.5 kW. This proves beyond any doubt that the test, as conceived by DGT, does not measure correctly the thermal power produced which in this case would have to be less than or at most equal to the electrical power input. https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/dgt-faulty-demo-140502-english.pdf0279名無しのひみつ2018/01/21(日) 10:25:29.83ID:BoIM7P2l まだやってたのかよ 完膚なきまでの大敗北を喫しつつある自称正統派のしょくん 君らがどうあがこうが常温核融合の研究開発は粛々と進んでいく 東北大も神戸大も本気になり始めた
8 Experimental results Figure 8 shows the plot of the thermal power measured using the standard DGT protocol in the verification test conducted by DE using Ar in place of H2 and using the procedure that induces the pressure variations due to water boiling, as described in Parargph 7. It is clearly noted that, while using Ar (considered by DGT an inert element for prompting the reaction and used as a reference gas to show that the reaction does not occur using Ar) in place of H2 and without making use of the high voltage excitation circuit, we get a significant increase in the measured thermal power up to about 17 kW, well above that of the electrical power input of about 2.5 kW. This proves beyond any doubt that the test, as conceived by DGT, does not measure correctly the thermal power produced which in this case would have to be less than or at most equal to the electrical power input. https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/dgt-faulty-demo-140502-english.pdf0281名無しのひみつ2018/01/21(日) 10:27:44.94ID:TfF+CvCK 対照実験の意味も理解してないバカ、のフリをした詐欺師 0282名無しのひみつ2018/01/21(日) 10:30:02.76ID:B5reJqY+>>280 3年前の出来事をコピペし 数日前の記事を批判しようとするアホ 必死すぎw 0283名無しのひみつ2018/01/21(日) 10:32:07.49ID:uyidCZ5R 常温核融合によって似非科学者に転落した 数名ほどの自称正統派大敗北者が暴れまくるのを生温かく見守るスレ 0284名無しのひみつ2018/01/21(日) 10:33:25.21ID:TfF+CvCK>>280 デフカリオン社の「常温核融合炉」が国際会議のライブ中継中に捏造と発覚 水素の代わりにアルゴンを使っても「過剰熱」が測定されてしまったため元々熱がちゃんと測れていないゴミ実験だったことが判明
8 Experimental results Figure 8 shows the plot of the thermal power measured using the standard DGT protocol in the verification test conducted by DE using Ar in place of H2 and using the procedure that induces the pressure variations due to water boiling, as described in Parargph 7. It is clearly noted that, while using Ar (considered by DGT an inert element for prompting the reaction and used as a reference gas to show that the reaction does not occur using Ar) in place of H2 and without making use of the high voltage excitation circuit, we get a significant increase in the measured thermal power up to about 17 kW, well above that of the electrical power input of about 2.5 kW. This proves beyond any doubt that the test, as conceived by DGT, does not measure correctly the thermal power produced which in this case would have to be less than or at most equal to the electrical power input. https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/dgt-faulty-demo-140502-english.pdf0285名無しのひみつ2018/01/21(日) 10:33:54.82ID:TfF+CvCK>>282 >>1のアホ記事では対照実験やってないから確実に捏造だね 0286名無しのひみつ2018/01/21(日) 10:35:33.78ID:uyidCZ5R>>284 狂ったようにコピペしたところ 自分自身のレスに誤爆自爆 なにをやっとるんだおまえはw