クライアントのダウンロードはIEのみ(エッジ、クローム等不可) WINDOWS 10 にもIE11が標準でインストールされているので、ダウンロード・インストール・プレイが可能です 分割ダウンロードしか上手くいかない場合が多いです 上手くいかない場合は、アマゾンなどで中古のインストールパッケージが200円〜3000円程度で入手出来ます Microsft Visual Studio 【2015】 Visual C++ 再頒布可能パッケージのインストールVisual Studio 2012 更新プログラム 4 の Visual C++ 再頒布可能パッケージが必須 注意*2012年度版+2015年度版しか対応しておらず、他年度版だけでは動きません
ノルマを達成しないと、どうなるんですか? A ここ数年だと400?500人くらいがワンフロアに全員そろって研修を受けるのですが、研修期間後半になると、ノルマを達成していない人は、その場で毎朝立たされる模様です。 最後まで達成しなくても特に罰則はないのですが、人事部から「達成しないとか、そういうことはありえなくないですか?」とか、嫌みを言われるみたいです。 ーー達成すると、何かいいことがあるんですか? A 契約30件につき、金の折り鶴が1つ渡されます(笑)。60枚、90枚……と増えていくと、自分の机の上に、金の鶴がどんどん増えていくんです。 聞いた話だと、過去には1000件近く集めた人がいて、その人は大学の後輩とかをフルに使って、やっていたようですね。
A ここ数年だと400?500人くらいがワンフロアに全員そろって研修を受けるのですが、研修期間後半になると、ノルマを達成していない人は、その場で毎朝立たされる模様です。 最後まで達成しなくても特に罰則はないのですが、人事部から「達成しないとか、そういうことはありえなくないですか?」とか、嫌みを言われるみたいです。
ーー達成すると、何かいいことがあるんですか?
A 契約30件につき、金の折り鶴が1つ渡されます(笑)。60枚、90枚……と増えていくと、自分の机の上に、金の鶴がどんどん増えていくんです。 聞いた話だと、過去には1000件近く集めた人がいて、その人は大学の後輩とかをフルに使って、やっていたようですね。 http://biz-journal.jp/2013/01/post_1266.html0319名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/15(火) 13:18:16.79ID:CCTfUgGN>>303 自民を肯定する気さらさらないが!ミンス政権思い出してみ。
“Google, Amazon and Redmond, Wash.- based Microsoft all provide similar services, and for the most part users are picking one based on their previous experience as well as on incentives those providers give.
“Right now Google and Microsoft are behind Amazon, but just because they had a late start. With Google and Microsoft's control on businesses/enterprises, my hunch is that they will quickly catch up to Amazon and stay competitive,”
“Large enterprises will make multi-cloud a strategic business imperative. Companies have been burnt by putting too much reliance on one vendor for multiple software needs. Having learnt that lesson, large enterprises are enterprises are wary of doing the same with cloud vendors like AWS.”
“Large enterprises will make multi-cloud a strategic business imperative. Companies have been burnt by putting too much reliance on one vendor for multiple software needs. Having learnt that lesson, large enterprises are enterprises are wary of doing the same with cloud vendors like AWS.”
https://www.zdnet.com/article/cloud-computing-googles-new-gpu-service-offers-cut-price-machine-learning/ Cloud computing: Google's new GPU service offers cut-price machine learning The new service is a good fit for large-scale machine learning and other distributed batch workloads, says Google. 0351名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/15(火) 23:31:36.84ID:L73GCHd/ 俺はアマゾン株買った 天井なのかも 配当金ないので値上がりだけが楽しみなのに 0352名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/15(火) 23:45:55.43ID:cECo3bge もの凄いいまさら感 自国企業の内部留保ばかり叩いて、なんで外資の脱税を糾弾しないのか?と言う指摘をずっと無視し続けてきた赤旗のアリバイ報道 0353名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/15(火) 23:53:34.56ID:dK2VVVpW もしかしてアマゾンジャパンのせいで法人税減税、 消費税増税の流れになってるのか? ふざけんなよ、アマゾンジャパン 0354名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/15(火) 23:54:11.71ID:cECo3bge>>16 税金払わなくてよければ頑張ります 0355名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/15(火) 23:54:20.36ID:3xUVTX0L 実際Amazonの方が生活を豊かにしてくれるだろ Amazonプライムのサービス最高だぞ。
A company offering online services has its headquarters in Country A but most of the users of these services are actually in Country B.
The profits of this company are created through user activity in Country B, but are taxed in Country A because that is where the company’s headquarters are.
Sometimes, companies will install their headquarters in Country A on purpose if the tax rate is lower in that country - even if they don’t have many users there.
If confirmed, a ruling against Amazon would come a year after the EU decided that US tech icon Apple had received similar favourable tax terms and ordered it to repay 13 billion euros ($14.5 billion) in back-taxes to Ireland. 0386名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/16(水) 06:22:00.77ID:ZwVq0AZe>>1
It's not in my mission to work against Euroskepticism; it's my mission to work for fair markets. In antitrust, what is at stake is, in some ways, as old as Adam and Eve because it is about greed, to get more. Margrethe Vestager
独占禁止法というならブランダイスだろう
There must be reasonable restrictions upon competition else we shall see competition destroyed. Louis Brandeis(米国最高裁判事)
We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both. Louis Brandeis(米国最高裁判事)
Who can complain about the price that Google is charging you? Or who can complain about Amazon's prices; they are simply lower than the competition's. And that's why I think we need to shift back to a more Brandeisian conception of antitrust, where we consider values other than simply efficiency and low prices. Franklin Foer 0390名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/16(水) 06:25:15.97ID:ZwVq0AZe>>1
“America was founded to provide people the wherewithal to protect ourselves from enslavement,” said Barry Lynn of the open-markets program at the New America Foundation. Perhaps nobody in the New Brandeis movement has done more than Lynn to revive the Progressive-era conception of monopoly as a danger to American liberty. “Anti-monopoly, from the Boston Tea Party onward, was one of the key tools that we the people used to keep ourselves free,” he said. .... The New Brandeisians took a broad look at how the failure to stop monopolization has harmed America. John Kwoka of Northeastern University crunched the data to find that current enforcement techniques aren’t even working to protect people from price increases, let alone monopoly’s other effects. Lina Khan, a Yale Law student and the author of “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox,” which described how Amazon uses its wealth of customer data collected from companies operating on its platform to compete against them, counseled against the learned helplessness that current laws cannot be fashioned to deal with modern tech firms. Sabeel Rahman of Brooklyn Law School explained how monopoly “warps the structure of opportunity of our economy.” Jonathan Kanter, formerly of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, warned that the fear in the antitrust agencies of overreaching has become a paralysis that fails to serve the public. Zephyr Teachout of Fordham Law (and a former congressional candidate) made the case for political antitrust, that big companies undermine democracy through their collected influence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com_controversies Removal of competitors' products On October 1, 2015, Amazon announced that Apple TV and Google Chromecast products were banned from sale on Amazon.com by all merchants, with no new listings allowed effective immediately, and all existing listings removed effective October 29, 2015. Amazon argued that this was to prevent "customer confusion", as these devices do not support the Amazon Video ecosystem. This move was criticized, as commentators believed that it was meant primarily to suppress the sale of products deemed as competition to Amazon Fire TV products, given that Amazon itself had deliberately refused to offer software for its own streaming services on these devices, and the action contradicted the implication that Amazon.com was a general online retailer.[25][26][27]
In May 2017, it was reported that Apple and Amazon were nearing an agreement to offer Amazon Video on Apple TV, and allow the product to return to the retailer.[28] Amazon Video launched on Apple TV December 6, 2017.[29]
Amazon has since suppressed other Google products, including Google Home (which competes with Amazon Echo), Pixel phones, and recent products of Google subsidiary Nest Labs (despite the Nest Learning Thermostat having Alexa support). In retaliation, Google announced on December 6, 2017 that it would block YouTube from the Amazon Echo Show and Amazon Fire TV products.[30][31][32][33] In December 2017, Amazon stated that it intended to start offering Chromecast again, but as of March 2018, it has not actually done so. Meanwhile, Nest stated that it would no longer offer any of its future stock to Amazon until it commits to offering its entire product line.[34] 0394名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/16(水) 06:27:53.96ID:ZwVq0AZehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com_controversies#Removal_of_competitors'_products Tax avoidance in the UK It was reported in The Guardian, April 4, 2012, that Amazon generated more than £3.3bn of sales in the UK but paid no corporation tax at all on the profits, and that it was under investigation by the UK tax authorities.[41] Amazon's tax affairs are also being investigated in China, Germany, France, Japan and Luxembourg.[citation needed] 0395名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/16(水) 06:28:33.54ID:ZwVq0AZehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com_controversies#Removal_of_competitors'_products
In 2017, Amazon removed an inordinate number of 1-star reviews from the listing of former Presidential candidate Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton's newest book, What Happened. The book carried a 4.9 out of 5 rating as of Friday, September 15, 2017.[75] 0396名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/16(水) 06:30:04.05ID:ZwVq0AZe サイエントロジーに対するネガティブレビューに対しては自らルール違反をしてレビューを削除するアマゾン
Allegations have been made that Amazon has selectively deleted negative reviews of Scientology-related items despite compliance with comments guidelines.[71][72] 0397名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/16(水) 06:32:55.08ID:ZwVq0AZe コーネル大学によると85%の好評を博する商品レビューは対価を得ている
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com_controversies#Removal_of_competitors'_products A study at Cornell University in that year[69] asserted that 85% of Amazon’s high-status consumer reviewers “had received free products from publishers, agents, authors and manufacturers.” By June 2011, Amazon itself had moved into the publishing business and begun to solicit positive reviews from established authors in exchange for increased promotion of their own books and upcoming projects.[70] 0398名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/16(水) 06:40:31.07ID:DzprljP8 安倍、何とか言えよ
Pedophile guide On November 10, 2010, a controversy arose over the sale by Amazon of an e-book by Phillip R. Greaves entitled The Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure: a Child-lover's Code of Conduct.[82]
Readers threatened to boycott Amazon over its selling of the book, which was described by critics as a "pedophile guide". Amazon initially defended the sale of the book, saying that the site "believes it is censorship not to sell certain books simply because we or others believe their message is objectionable"[83] and that the site "supported the right of every individual to make their own purchasing decisions". However, the site later removed the book.[84] The San Francisco Chronicle wrote that Amazon "defended the book, then removed it, then reinstated it, and then removed it again".[83] 0401名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/16(水) 06:45:10.80ID:ZwVq0AZe 犯罪者を擁護していたアマゾン
Greaves was arrested on December 20, 2010 at his Pueblo, Colorado home on a felony warrant issued by the Polk County Sheriff's Office in Lakeland, Florida. Detectives from the county's Internet Crimes Division ordered a signed hard copy version of Greaves' book and had it shipped to the agency's jurisdiction, where it violated state obscenity laws. According to Sheriff Grady Judd, upon receipt of the book, Greaves violated local laws prohibiting the distribution of "obscene material depicting minors engaged in harmful conduct," a third degree felony.[87] Greaves pleaded no contest to the charges and was later released under probation with his previous jail time counting as time served.[88] 0402名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/16(水) 06:47:23.53ID:ZwVq0AZe アマゾンにはVine転売屋が存在する
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com_controversies#Removal_of_competitors'_products "Amazon ships a lot of electronics and food now. It's not good to have that stuff in extreme temperatures," said Sucharita Mulpuru, an analyst with Forrester Research. "I would like to think there was an element of humanity to the decision but there's nothing in Amazon's history or in Jeff Bezos' public persona that would lead me to think that was the driver of the decision. … Rarely has Amazon made any business decisions that didn't affect the bottom line."[103]
Amazon UK On 2 August 2013 the Daily Mail ran an expose outing Amazon UK for employee GPS 'tagging' and subjecting them to harsh working conditions, describing employees as 'human robots', the newspaper said that Amazon employed 'controversial' zero-hour contracts as a tool to reprimand staff.[105] A Channel 4 documentary broadcast on the 1st August 2013 employed secret cameras within Amazon UK's Rugeley warehouse documenting worker abuses and made similar claim to the Daily Mail calling the working practices 'horrendous and exhausting'.[106] 0410名刺は切らしておりまして2018/05/16(水) 06:53:40.07ID:ZwVq0AZe>>1
Warehouse conditions In September 2011, Allentown, Pennsylvania's Morning Call interviewed 20 past and present employees at Amazon's Breinigsville warehouse, all but one of whom criticized the company's warehouse conditions and employment practice. Specific investigatory concerns were: heat so extreme it required the regular posting of ambulances to take away workers who passed out,[95] strenuous workloads in that heat, and first-person reports of summary terminations for health conditions such as breast cancer.[96] The Morning Call also published, verbatim, Amazon.com's direct response to a query by OSHA,[97] where amazon.com detailed its response when heat conditions reach as high as 114 °F (46 °C), including water and ice treatment, electrolyte drinks, nutrition advice, and extended breaks in air conditioned rooms.[98] Five days after the Morning Call article was published, Amazon stated that it had spent $2.4 million "urgently installing" air conditioning at four warehouses including the Breinigsville facility.[99] However, the original investigator states that when he checked back with current employees for his September 23 follow-up story, "they told him nothing had changed since his original story ran."[100]