But legal experts say it’s impossible for courts to ultimately stop those states
from appointing electors by the December deadline.
“It would take the most unjustified and bizarre intervention by courts that this
country has ever seen,” said Danielle Lang of the Campaign Legal Center. “I haven’t
seen anything in any of those lawsuits that has any kind of merit ? let alone enough
to delay appointing electors.
法律専門家は法廷が12月のデッドラインに選挙人選択を止めさせる事は不可能という

Even if Trump won a single court fight, there’s another potential roadblock: Congress
could be the final arbiter of whether to accept disputed slates of electors,
according to the Electoral Count Act of 1887, the law outlining the process. In the
end, if the Democratic-controlled House and GOP-controlled Senate could not agree on
which electors to accept, and there is no vote and no winner, the presidency would
pass to the next person in the line of succession at the end of Trump and Vice President
Mike Pence’s term on Jan. 20. That would be House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat.

DeSantis urged Pennsylvania and Michigan residents to call state lawmakers and urge
them to intervene. “Under Article 2 of the Constitution, presidential electors are
done by the legislatures and the schemes they create and the framework. And if there’s
departure from that, if they’re not following the law, if they’re ignoring law, then
they can provide remedies as well,” he said.
フロリダ州知事のDeSantisはペンシルバニアとミシガンで州議会が干渉するように呼びかけているが

Republican lawmakers, however, appear to be holding steady. “The Pennsylvania General
Assembly does not have and will not have a hand in choosing the state’s presidential
electors or in deciding the outcome of the presidential election,” top Republican
legislative leaders, state Sen. Jake Corman and Rep. Kerry Benninghoff, wrote in an
October op-ed. Their offices said Friday they stand by the statement.
ペンシルバニアの上院指導者のJake Corman and Rep. Kerry Benninghoffはその呼びかけを拒否