A company offering online services has its headquarters in Country A – but most of the users of these services are actually in Country B.
The profits of this company are created through user activity in Country B, but are taxed in Country A – because that is where the company’s headquarters are.
Sometimes, companies will install their headquarters in Country A on purpose if the tax rate is lower in that country - even if they don’t have many users there.
If confirmed, a ruling against Amazon would come a year after the EU decided that US tech icon Apple had received similar favourable tax terms and ordered it to repay 13 billion euros ($14.5 billion) in back-taxes to Ireland. 0004名刺は切らしておりまして垢版2018/04/13(金) 19:21:59.40ID:TQEVpd+zhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Australia
In November 2012, the former Labor Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, withdrew his party's mandatory Internet filter.[10] On the same day, the then Communications Minister stated that as a result of notices to the Australian largest ISPs, over 90% of Australians using Internet Services are going to have a web filter. Australian Federal Police will then pursue smaller ISPs and work with them to meeting their "obligation under Australian law".[11] iiNet and Internode quietly confirmed that the request to block content from Australian Federal Police went from voluntary to mandatory under s313 in an existing law. iiNet had sought legal advice and accepted the s313 mandatory notice but would not reveal the legal advice publicly.[12]
In June 2015, the country passed an amendment which will allow the court-ordered blocking of websites deemed to primarily facilitate copyright infringement.
In December 2016, the Federal Court of Australia ordered more than fifty ISP's to block 5 sites that infringe on the Copyright Act after rights holders, Roadshow Films, Foxtel, Disney, Paramount, Columbia and the 20th Century Fox companies filed a lawsuit. The sites barred include The Pirate Bay, Torrentz, TorrentHound, IsoHunt and SolarMovie. 0005名刺は切らしておりまして垢版2018/04/13(金) 19:22:14.88ID:TQEVpd+z>>1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_United_States#Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act_(DMCA) Proponents of protecting intellectual property online in the United States have been much more successful, producing a system to remove infringing materials that many feel errs on the side of inhibiting legally protected speech.[3][6] The US practices forceful seizures of domains and computers, at times without notification, causing the websites to be unable to continue operating.[7][8][9][10] Some high-profile cases are Napster,[11][12][13] Wikileaks,[14][15] The Pirate Bay,[16] and MegaUpload.[17]
Current situation Internet customers in the UK are prohibited from accessing a range of web sites by default, because they have their Internet access filtered by their ISPs. The filtering program has applied to new ISP customers since the end of 2013, and has been extended to existing users on a rolling basis. A voluntary code of practice agreed by all four major ISPs[8] means that customers have to 'opt out' of the ISP filtering to gain access to the blocked content.[9] However, the complex nature of the active monitoring systems means that users cannot usually opt out of the monitoring and re-routing of their data traffic, something which may render their data security vulnerable. The range of content blocked by ISPs can be varied over time.[10] Categories blocked across the major ISPs include: Dating, Drugs, Alcohol and Tobacco, File sharing, Gambling, Games, Pornography, Nudity, Social networking, Suicide and Self-harm, Weapons and violence, Obscenity, Criminal Skills, Hate, Media Streaming, Fashion and Beauty, Gore, Cyberbullying, Hacking and Web-blocking circumvention tools 0007名刺は切らしておりまして垢版2018/04/13(金) 19:25:20.45ID:ZWMO9DVN そもそも他国出版の著作物は著作権なしっていうアメリカのダブスタが悪いんだよ アメリカ人のアホが自分は悪くないとやったもんだからここまで悪化した
